Restaurants are one of the slipperiest environments most of us walk into all week: grease drifting from the kitchen, dropped food and drinks, mopped floors during a dinner rush, and rain tracked through the front door. When a Michigan restaurant lets a hazard linger, a diner can end up with a broken wrist, a concussion, or a torn shoulder.
We're Big League Injury Lawyers, and restaurant falls raise some legal wrinkles you won't find in a typical store case — including Michigan's dram shop law when alcohol is in the mix. Here's how liability works and how to protect yourself if you're hurt while dining out.
Certain spots inside a restaurant are predictable trouble:
As a paying customer, you're a business invitee. A Michigan restaurant must exercise reasonable care to keep its premises reasonably safe, inspect for hazards, clean up or warn of dangers it knows about, and address dangers it should discover through reasonable inspection. That includes greasy kitchens and busy dining rooms — a restaurant can't ignore the very messes its own operation constantly creates.
Like any premises case, you generally have to prove the restaurant had notice of the hazard. That means showing one of three things:
Restaurants can be especially exposed on the "created the hazard" prong, because so many spills come directly from employees carrying food and drinks. When staff conduct causes the danger, you don't have to prove how long it sat there.
Expect the restaurant's insurer to argue the hazard was open and obvious — that a reasonable diner would have seen and avoided it. Michigan's treatment of this defense has shifted in recent years: rather than serving as an automatic, total bar to recovery, the obviousness of a hazard is now generally folded into the comparative-fault analysis. In a dim dining room or a crowded aisle, whether a hazard was truly "obvious" is often a genuine fact question — not the easy defense win it used to be.
Restaurants that serve alcohol carry an extra layer of potential liability under Michigan's dram shop act, MCL 436.1801. If a restaurant or bar serves alcohol to someone who is visibly intoxicated or to a minor, and that person then injures someone — on the premises or off — the establishment can be liable for the resulting harm. Dram shop claims have strict procedural requirements, including a written notice requirement and the naming of the allegedly intoxicated person, plus a shorter timeline than ordinary injury claims. If alcohol played a role in your injury at a restaurant, this is a critical avenue that has to be evaluated quickly.
Michigan's modified comparative negligence applies. If you share blame — you were looking at your phone, you ignored a posted cone, or your own intoxication contributed — your recovery is reduced by your share of fault, and being more than 50% at fault can bar non-economic damages entirely. The stronger your evidence that the restaurant created or ignored the hazard, the less traction these arguments get.
A night out shouldn't end in the emergency room. When a Michigan restaurant lets grease sit, mops without warning, or over-serves a patron who then hurts someone, the law provides a path to hold it accountable — through premises liability, dram shop law, or both. These cases move fast on evidence, especially surveillance video, so acting quickly is key. We handle restaurant injury cases on contingency, meaning no fee unless we win. If you were hurt dining out in Michigan, let us look at exactly what happened.
Free consultation. No fee unless we win. From greasy floors to over-serving, we'll dig into the facts and tell you straight whether you have a claim.
Start a Free Case EvaluationCall (855) SWING-BIG