A staircase is one of the few places where a single missed step can send you falling six, eight, or ten feet onto hard edges. When a stair collapses, a tread is loose, or you reach for a handrail that gives way, the injuries are often severe — and in Michigan, a broken stairway usually means someone failed to maintain it.
We're Big League Injury Lawyers, and stairway cases are among the more provable premises claims we handle, because stairs are heavily governed by building codes. When a step or railing doesn't meet code — or has obviously deteriorated — that's concrete evidence of a dangerous condition. Here's how these cases work in Michigan.
Unlike a flat-surface slip, a stairway fall adds height and momentum. Victims frequently suffer:
For older adults, a stairway fall can be life-altering — a broken hip can lead to a permanent loss of independence.
This is what sets stairway cases apart. Stairs are precisely regulated — Michigan's adopted building codes set standards for riser height, tread depth, handrail height and graspability, guardrails, and stairway lighting. When a staircase violates those standards, that violation is powerful proof that the property owner allowed a dangerous condition to exist.
Typical code issues our investigations uncover include:
Documenting these violations often requires photographs, measurements, and sometimes a safety or engineering expert — another reason to involve a lawyer while the staircase is still in its original condition.
A stairway fall is a premises liability claim. As a lawful visitor — a tenant, customer, or guest — you're owed reasonable care. To recover, you generally must show the property owner or manager knew or should have known about the dangerous condition and failed to fix it or warn about it. A code violation, a rotted tread, or a long-loose railing all help establish that the danger existed long enough that a reasonable owner should have caught and corrected it.
Property owners often argue a hazard was open and obvious — that you could see the broken step and should have avoided it. Michigan law on this defense has changed meaningfully. The obviousness of a hazard is now generally treated as part of the comparative-fault analysis rather than an automatic, complete bar to your claim. So even a visible defect no longer necessarily ends a case the way it once did, though it may reduce recovery. With stairs, there's also the reality that a defect like an under-height rail or an inconsistent riser often isn't obvious until you're already falling.
Michigan's modified comparative negligence applies: if you were partly at fault — rushing, carrying a load that blocked your view, wearing unsafe footwear — your recovery is reduced by your share, and being more than 50% at fault can bar non-economic damages. And the general three-year statute of limitations for injury claims runs from the date of the fall. Acting promptly also protects the physical evidence, since owners tend to repair a broken staircase quickly once someone gets hurt.
Stairs are supposed to be the safe, predictable part of a building — and codes exist precisely so they stay that way. When an owner lets a step rot, a rail loosen, or a stairwell go dark, a fall isn't bad luck; it's a failure to maintain a known danger. Because building-code violations make these cases so provable, and because owners repair the evidence fast, moving quickly matters. We handle stairway falls on contingency — no fee unless we win — so let us document that staircase before it's fixed and gone.
Free consultation. No fee unless we win. Code violations make these cases provable — call now and we'll move to preserve the evidence and pursue your claim.
Start a Free Case EvaluationCall (855) SWING-BIG